One comparison of the M1 Max with the 32-core GPU choice claimed it offered “ graphics performance comparable to that in a high-end compendious personal computer pro laptop using up to 40 % less baron. ” A closer inspection of the crusade exhaust has Apple saying that compact notebook was the Razer Blade 15 Advanced, complete with the model numeral, RZ09-0409CE53-R3U1. At first glance, the configurations list of that particular notebook points to Apple selecting a very high-performance system, one that would be the prototype of a bet on notebook. Using Apple ‘s selected Razer Blade 15 Advanced shape, here ‘s how the stay of the notebook compares to the 16-inch MacBook Pro.
Specifications
16-inch MacBook Pro (2021)Razer Blade 15 AdvancedDisplay Size (inches)16.215.6-inch Max Resolution3,456 x 2,2343,840 x 2,160Pixel Density254282Display TechnologyMini LED-Backlit,
Wide Color (P3),
True Tone
ProMotionOLED,
60Hz
Touchscreen
100% DCI-P3Processors10-core M1 Pro,
10-core M1 Max11th-gen 8-core Intel Core i9-11900HMemory16GB Unified Memory, up to 64GB32GB DDR4 3200HzGraphicsM1 Pro 16-core,
M1 Max 24-core
M1 Max 32-coreNvidia GeForce RTX 3080 16GB,
Intel UHD GraphicsStorage512GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB1TB M.2 PCIe NVMeBiometricsTouch IDWindows HelloTrackpadForce TouchYesKeyboardBacklit with ambient light sensorPer-key backlighting with Razer ChromaDimensions (inches)14.01x 9.77 x 0.6613.98 x 9.25 x 0.67Weight (pounds)4.7 (M1 Pro),
4.8 (M1 Max)4.4Battery Life21 HoursAround 6 hoursPorts3 Thunderbolt 4 ports,
HDMI,
SDXC card slot,
MagSafe 3,
Headphone jack2 Thunderbolt 4 ports
2 USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 with 15W Power Delivery
3 USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
UHS-III SD Card Reader
HDMI 2.1
Headphone jack
Webcam1080p FaceTime HD1080p IRSpeakersSix speakers with force-cancelling woofers, Dolby AtmosStereo with THX Spatial AudioMicrophones3 with directional beamforming4-mic arrayWi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6EBluetooth5.05.2Power Supply140W230WColor OptionsSilver, Space GrayAnodized BlackPricefrom $2,499$3,399
16-inch MacBook Pro vs Razer Blade 15 Advanced – Physical Dimensions
The MacBook Pro uses an aluminum shell in a pair of Apple ‘s traditional Mac color options, namely Silver and Space Gray. It ‘s a well-known and impregnable invention that makes it instantaneously recognizable to onlookers. Razer has tried to follow the like path with its own products, following Apple ‘s playbook in providing a signature style and semblance dodge that it surely employs in the Blade 15 Advanced. Razer surely goes for a like industrial appearance with flat sides and a thin body, though it uses a little sharpen on the sides to enhance its reduce appearance. The body does copy Apple in being aluminum, except here Razer has anodized it black and made the company logo on the lead a bright and contrasting green. Apple has the larger design overall, but not by much, with a 14.01 by 9.77-inch footprint countered by Razer with 13.98 by 9.25 inches. The difference in footprint can be accounted for by Apple having a slenderly larger expose, but they ‘re still quite comparable. As for the thickness, the 16-inch MacBook Pro is 0.66 inches, while the Razer is 0.67 inches. This is quite applaudable for Razer, given that most bet on notebooks tend to be much thick overall .
Razer includes a smaller display, but one with a higher pixel density than the 16-inch MacBook Pro
On the weight side, Apple loses out a little bit here, in that the 16-inch MacBook Pro is either 4.7 pounds or 4.8 pounds, depending on whether you go for the M1 Pro or M1 Max. interim, the Blade is a bit lighter at 4.4 pounds.
16-inch MacBook Pro vs Razer Blade 15 Advanced – Display
This was touched upon earlier, but the two notebooks have quite different screens, in a bombastic number of ways. The obvious one is the display size, with Razer opting for a 15.6-inch screen while Apple uses a 16.2-inch version. Apple ‘s display has a resolution of 3,456 by 2,234 pixels, which gives it a pixel concentration of 254 pixels per column inch. Razer ‘s screen door in this configuration is a 4K panel with a resolution of 3,840 by 2,160, and a higher pixel density at 282ppi. There ‘s a compete of technologies as well, with Apple choosing to use Mini LED for its backlighting, giving the MacBook Pro high levels of brightness at 1,000 nits fullscreen, 1,600 nits at acme. It besides includes Wide Color ( P3 ), True Tone, ProMotion confirm, and a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio. Razer ‘s display in this particular notebook is an organic light-emitting diode empanel, which can result in a bright trope with highly high contrast ratios and color representation versus typical LED-backlit LCD screens. Razer has not specified what the contrast or luminosity of the display are, but it ‘s safe to expect the OLED panel to be bright and high gear quality in its own properly. The party does say the Blade ‘s screen has 100 % coverage of the DCI-P3 color space, HDR support, person factory calibration, and a 1ms response time .
The OLED panel on the 4K Blade 15 Advanced is also a touchscreen.
The review rate for the Blade is just 60Hz, which is fairly standard, though while it falls short of Apple ‘s display, it even fades behind alternate Blade configurations, such as a 360Hz 1080p filmdom, or a 240Hz QHD display. The Blade does, however, benefit from being a touch screen, an much clamored-for engineering by some MacBook Pro users that has plainly failed to make it onto the Mac. Apple ‘s screen is slightly hindered by the inclusion of a notch in the in-between of the top boundary, which cuts into the display. While it eats into the menu banish, macOS does push full-screen content to below the pass itself, efficaciously using the lapp space as a 16-inch display.
16-inch MacBook Pro vs Razer Blade 15 Advanced – CPU Performance
The fresh 16-inch MacBook Pro uses the M1 Pro and M1 Max, versions with 10-cores consisting of two efficiency cores and eight high-performance cores. The two versions are practically identical CPU-wise in their construction, but there are some early differences that can affect operation. For example, the Fabric in M1 Pro has a memory bandwidth of up to 200GB/s, whereas the M1 Max has double at 400GB/s. You can besides have more memory on the Max, as the M1 Pro starts at 16GB with a 32GB choice, while the M1 Max starts at 32GB with a 64GB upgrade available. Another difference is the Media Engine, a new accession that handles video recording encoding and decoding tasks in an efficient way. Both can deal with H.264, HEVC, ProRes, and ProRes RAW encode and decode, but the M1 Max has two television encode engines and two ProRes encode and decode engines over the M1 Pro ‘s interpretation. The Blade configuration used by Apple has the Intel Core i9-11900H, an 11th-generation Tiger Lake chip from Q2 2021. The eight-core, 16-thread chip has a base clock focal ratio of 2.5Ghz, rising to 4.9GHz under Turbo Boost. On a benchmark footing, the Core i9 scores around 1,600 for Geekbench 5 ‘s single-core screen, rising to around 9,100 for the multi-core mark. In AppleInsider ‘s run of the benchmark, the M1 Pro scored 1,760 and 7,723 respectively in the single and multi-core tests, while the M1 Max managed a comparable 1,769 and 12,308. obviously, Apple ‘s fresh chips are running well, in share due to the higher per-core score, and that there are 10 cores to Intel ‘s 8 cores.
16-inch MacBook Pro vs Razer Blade 15 Advanced – Graphics Performance
The main detail of comparison for Apple is the Blade ‘s graphics, and how the top-end M1 Pro pretty much matched the GPU Razer used .
This Apple-produced chart compared the 32-core GPU in the M1 Max with the Razer Blade 15 Advanced.
For that specific configuration, the Blade 15 Advanced was packed with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 with 16GB of GDDR6. Razer besides has configurations for an RTX 3060 and RTX 3070, but Apple went for the peak end of the spectrum. The processor besides offers Intel UHD graphics as an incorporate alternative to the discrete GPU. The M1 Pro for the 16-inch MacBook Pro has an Apple-designed GPU with 16 cores, while the M1 Max increases the count to 24 cores or 32 cores. Since Apple uses Unified Memory, the GPU shares the same pool of memory as the CPU, similar to integrated graphics options. It differs in that the Unified Memory structure allows the CPU, the GPU, and early elements to access the lapp memory collection without duplicating data into disjoined pools, making it potentially more efficient for process. This means that the GPU ‘s memory relies on the amount configured with the Mac itself, so it has up to 64GB to play with in the higher-end configurations. To a bespeak, this reasonably much negates the Blade ‘s advantage of having thus much dedicated video recording memory. AppleInsider ‘s Geekbench 5 Metal benchmark tests saw a score of 40,991 for the M1 Pro with a 16 core GPU, while the M1 Max with a 32-core GPU achieved 68,950 in the lapp screen. For address, the M1 with an 8-core GPU scored 21,425 under the lapp test. hera ‘s where things get muddy, as it is not presently possible to perform the lapp Metal test using an Nvidia GPU due to a long-run lack of macOS support. The nearest analogue would be the GeekBench OpenCL trial.
As of yet, there are no post OpenCL test results for the M1 Max or M1 Pro, however, there is one for the M1, at 18,260. Geekbench says the Geforce RTX 3080 as a laptop GPU scores 128,800. even if we go by Apple ‘s claim of the M1 Max being four times arsenic knock-down as the M1, this distillery puts the theoretical M1 Max GPU ‘s score at around 80,000, which however leaves quite a gap. It remains unknown what accurate combination of benchmark results Apple used to score a higher “ relative performance ” than that specific Blade ‘s GPU, but it surely does n’t take away the fact that Apple ‘s made an integrated GPU that can perform very well. At the lapp fourth dimension, doing so without being as power-hungry.
16-inch MacBook Pro vs Razer Blade 15 Advanced – Camera and Biometrics
Apple includes a 1080p FaceTime HD camera in its 16-inch MacBook Pro, located inside the ill-famed display notch. While not benefiting from a fully TrueDepth television camera array, the visualize device Apple has used does at least profit from the prototype signal march elements of the M1. Razer uses its own 1080p webcam, though it is one with infrared capabilities, enabling it to support Windows Hello. This gives it a shape of ocular biometrics that Apple could ‘ve countered with Face ID, if it had included the aforesaid TrueDepth television camera. On the subject of biometrics, Apple does inactive offer Touch ID via a button in the top-right of the keyboard.
16-inch MacBook Pro vs Razer Blade 15 Advanced – Storage, Memory, Connectivity
Apple ‘s repositing options start from 512GB, rising to 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, and topping out at 8TB. The configuration of the Blade Apple selected uses a 1TB M.2 PCIe NVMe drive. technically, you can have two such drives installed, so you can add a secondary drive for extra storage, or even replace the original drive. There simply is no choice to upgrade the storage of the 16-inch MacBook Pro, unless you use an external Thunderbolt drive or something exchangeable .
Razer uses anodized aluminum for its Blade 15 Advanced casing.
On memory, Apple offers 16GB or 32GB of Unified Memory in the M1 Pro, rising to 32GB or 64GB in the M1 Max. The Razer Blade 15 Advanced uses 32GB of DDR4 3,200MHz dual-channel memory, but again these are components that could be switched out for higher capacities at a late time. once more, you can not perform such switching with the MacBook Pro. For connectivity, the 2021 MacBook Pro models improve from the previous coevals by offering three Thunderbolt 4 ports along with HDMI, an SDXC card time slot, a MagSafe 3 power joining, and a earphone jack. Razer includes two Thunderbolt 4 ports, two USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 ports with 15W power rescue, 3 USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports, an UHS-III SD tease proofreader, a HDMI 2.1 larboard, a power connection, and a earphone jack. For radio connectivity, the MacBook uses Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0, while the Blade opts for the newer Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2.
16-inch MacBook Pro vs Razer Blade 15 Advanced – Power and Other Details
In both cases, while you could charge the notebook by their respective dedicated might connections, you do n’t have to do that. Both could besides be recharged using USB-C if required, enabling each to be used with a dock with built-in ability delivery features. Apple includes a bigger battery in its MacBook Pro at 100W, versus the Blade ‘s 80W unit. It besides apparently lasts longer in the MacBook Pro, with Apple claiming it offers up to 21 hours of video playback or up to 14 hours of wireless network entree. By contrast, reviews and benchmarks for the Razer put its battery life at around 6 hours on average. This is n’t claim, as there ‘s variations in testing methodologies at shimmer, but given the by and large broken battery life of gaming notebooks, the name is reasonably close to world. Razer includes a more brawny power issue with its Blade at 230W, while Apple uses a 140W version. Apple includes more speakers in its MacBook Pro, with six including force-cancelling woofers and Dolby Atmos hold to the Blade ‘s Stereo with THX Spatial Audio support. Razer, however, has one more microphone at four in an array versus Apple ‘s three with directing beamforming .
The keys are individually backlit on the Blade 15 Advanced, with full RGB capabilities.
The MacBook Pro keyboard includes a backlighting system for seeing the keys in the dark. With its gambling lineage, Razer goes a few steps further. The Blade 15 Advanced has a per-key RGB backlighting system, which can display over 16.8 million colors in versatile ways. It besides offers dynamic ignite effects that work with over 150 Chroma-integrated games, so the keyboard ignition changes with your gameplay.
16-inch MacBook Pro vs Razer Blade 15 Advanced – Configuration Pricing
The specific shape of the Razer Blade 15 Advanced, with the Core i9, GeForce RTX 3080, 32GB of memory, 1TB of storage, and 4K OLED touch screen, costs $ 3,399. There are many early configurations available, and all but one are cheaper than what Apple selected, with the exception being a “ studio apartment edition ” translation fitted with a Quadro RTX500. The cheapest 16-inch MacBook Pro with the M1 Pro, 16GB of memory, and 512GB of storage costs $ 2,499. Bumping the RAM up to 32GB costs $ 400 extra. The cheapest M1 Max with a 24-core GPU, 32GB of memory, and 512GB of repositing retails for $ 3,099. It ‘s $ 400 to go to 64GB of memory, with exchangeable storage upgrade costs. If you want the 32-core GPU in the M1 Max, it ‘s an extra $ 200. To get a matching-specification MacBook Pro to the Blade that Apple credibly used in its examination, namely an M1 Max with a 32-core GPU, 32GB of memory, and 1TB of storage, that would cost you $ 3,499, about $ 100 more than the Blade in question.
A relatively even matchup
In other comparisons of high-performance notebooks that Apple itselfused, it was quite easily to say that the MacBook Pro provides a lot for the money. Along with antic operation, the respite of the MacBook Pro ‘s features helped make it a formidable notebook to compete against its rivals. It ‘s not quite the same story hera. Razer has a notebook that ‘s reasonably like in terms of construction and size, with a marginally smaller screen. That display besides happens to offer a higher pixel density and its OLED could be seen as a relatively comparable technology to the Mini LED display. For a change, the features are fairly even with each other. certain, they ‘re not precisely the same, but they ‘re close enough to be each early ‘s equivalent. You can hush tease out some plus and minus points from each slope though. For case, you ‘re not going to be burning through electricity with the 16-inch MacBook Pro when under load versus the Blade, but you ‘ll still get high performance from both notebooks. To the Blade ‘s benefit, it offers a touch screen, an interaction that Apple has ignored, preferring to leave it to the iPad family. then there are upgrades to memory and memory in the future, which just are n’t an option for the MacBook Pro. The bottom telephone line hera is that, indisputable, Apple ‘s comparison on performance to power savings is a worthy takeaway from looking at the two devices. But they ‘re still capital workhorses in their own right.
Where to buy
Apple ‘s 2021 16-inch MacBook Pro is already discounted, with single coupon savings at your fingertips in the AppleInsider 2021 16-inch MacBook Pro Price Guide.
At wardrobe time, the best MacBook Pro deals offer triple-digit savings on both retail and configure-to-order ( CTO ) models at Apple Authorized Reseller Adorama with promo code APINSIDER and this activation connect. bit-by-bit instructions detailing how to redeem the coupon can be found here. The Razer Blade 15 Advanced is presently on backorder at Razer directly and at B & H Photo .
